| Forgetting index |
You can choose the speed of learning
Forgetting index is the proportion of elements that are not remembered at repetitions. It is usually expressed as percentage. For example, if you choose the forgetting index equal 10%, SuperMemo will try to make sure that you remember 90% of elements during repetitions. The higher the forgetting index the faster you learn but ... the less you remember! You can choose the default forgetting index with Tools : Options : Learning : Forgetting index.
Extreme values of the forgetting index can be frustrating
SuperMemo makes it possible to choose a forgetting index in the range from 3% to 20%. Very often users of SuperMemo ask why there is a limitation on this range. We are aware that many of you would be tempted to set the forgetting index to 1% or even 0%. This would only result in unnecessary waste of time. Forgetting index equal 0% would mean that the intervals between repetitions should equal 0. If you decided to choose the forgetting index equal 1%, the repetitions would be so frequent that you would probably be discouraged to ever come back to SuperMemo without ever discovering its power. In addition, the spacing effect would make your memories very weak.
If you do not have much experience with SuperMemo, you should set the forgetting index to 10%. This is a value that is also important for psychological reasons. If the forgetting index is too high, your repetitions will be stressful due to constant problems with recall. Your material will seem very difficult to remember. This is quite frustrating. On the other hand, if the forgetting index is too low, your repetitions will be annoyingly frequent. You will experience a sense of wasting your time on needless repetition.
| If you feel you remember too little, reduce the forgetting index. If you feel you repeat too often, increase the forgetting index. In most cases the value of 8%-12% would be best |
Changing the forgetting index
Forgetting indexes used in SuperMemo
It is easy to confuse some terminology related to the forgetting index. Here is a short glossary:
Your actual retention is higher than indicated by the forgetting index
If you set your forgetting index to 10%, you will remember 90% of the material at repetitions but it does not mean your knowledge retention will stay at 90%. Your average retention will be nearly 95%! This comes from the fact that 90% refers to the retention at repetition while the original retention right after the repetition is theoretically 100%. During the inter-repetition interval, retention is decreasing from 100% to 90% on average you remember 95% of the material. The exact formula linking the forgetting index with the retention has the following shape (source):
retention = -(forgetting index)/ln(1-(forgetting index))
Forgetting index |
Retention |
| 3% | 98.49% |
| 5% | 97.47% |
| 10% | 94.91% |
| 15% | 92.29% |
| 20% | 89.62% |
The reason that the retention is not equal to 1-0.5*(forgetting index) is that forgetting is exponential in nature, i.e. immediately after the repetition, forgetting proceeds at the highest speed
Do you know that?
Frequently Asked Questions
(Tomasz
Szynalski, Poland, Oct 18, 1998)
Question:
What value of the forgetting index ensures the
optimum ratio of (retention)/(time spent per day)?
Answer:
Paradoxically, the highest speed of learning can be accomplished ... without SuperMemo! In
our daily life we pick up lots of facts that stay in our memory for long with few
repetitions in lifetime! The problem is that these are usually not exactly the facts or
rules that are critical to our goals. In other words, not the speed of acquiring new items
counts but the speed of acquiring new items bearing a given content.
It is difficult to determine exactly what forgetting index brings the highest acquisition rate. Simulation experiments have consistently pointed to the value of 25-30%. You can even plot speed-vs.-forgetting graph using your own actual learning material in SuperMemo 98 using Tools : Statistics : Simulation. You will probably also arrive to similar results
As you perhaps know, SuperMemo disallows of the forgetting index above 20%. This comes from the fact that you should aim at achieving high speed of learning combined with high retention of the learned material. Setting the forgetting index above 20% would be like giving up SuperMemo altogether and coming back to remembering only that what is easy to remember. In highly interlinked material where new knowledge depends on the previously acquired knowledge, high forgetting rate can even be more harmful
Nevertheless, if you want to maximize the speed of learning with little control over what actually stays in your memory, set the forgetting index to 20%
(Tomasz
Szynalski, Poland, Oct 18, 1998)
Question:
What retention can I obtain with the forgetting
index set to 9%? What if I then change it to 12%?
Answer:
If you accomplish the forgetting index of 9%, the retention will equal 95.4% (see the formula above). For 12%, the same figure will be 93.9%. Note that if
your material is very difficult, your measured forgetting index may be higher than the
requested forgetting index. This comes from the fact that SuperMemo imposes some boundary
conditions on the increase of intervals. Elements that have been forgotten more than five
times should be reformulated with a view to reducing their difficulty or increasing their
mnemonic component.
If you initially set the forgetting index to 9% and later on increase it to 12%, you will probably start with retention of 94-95% which will later gradually decrease to 92-93% (after the change)
(Peter Cool, The Netherlands, Nov 6, 1998)
Question:
I started with SuperMemo 70 days ago (your French plus some words added by me; total 1000
words). In the first weeks I made a lot of mistakes so my measured forgetting index was 20%. Although I make very few
mistakes now during repetitions the forgetting index decreases very slowly. Is this
normal?
Answer:
The measured forgetting index includes the record
of all repetitions made since you started learning. That is why it changes at an ever
decreasing rate. If your performance is good and you would like to more accurately check
your current forgetting index, you might reset the forgetting index measurements with File : Tools : Reset parameters : Forgetting index record. It
will not affect the learning process per se
(Manfred
Kremer, Germany, Sep 7, 1998)
Question:
I noticed that frequently I get Optimum
Interval in the element data window shorter
than the last interval displayed as Interval. Is it a bug in SuperMemo?
Answer:
No. If your forgetting
index is very low, e.g. 3%, SuperMemo will often conclude that you will stand 97%
chance of remembering a given element only if your next interval is shorter than the
presently used one. In such cases, it will not accept the new value and the new interval
will be at least 5% longer than the previous interval. Please note that the forgetting
index equal 3% should only be used for selected high-priority items. Keeping the
forgetting index at this level throughout the collection
will make repetitions annoying frequent and ineffective
(David Mckenzie, New Zealand, Apr 8, 1998)
Question:
Why does not the first repetition after forgetting occur the
next day after the unsuccessful repetition (this is advised by Tony Buzan and others)?
Answer:
In SuperMemo, the length of the first interval is computed from the forgetting curve
plotted in the course of repetitions. This is to make sure that a defined proportion of
items is remembered (usually 80-97%). This proportion is programmed by means of the
forgetting index. Depending on the forgetting index, the length of the first interval may
range from 1 to 20 days, and is not set arbitrarily. It is computed from the record of
repetitions and determined by the desired forgetting index (requested forgetting index is
the proportion of items that are not remembered at repetitions). While Buzan�s
recommendation is valid in many cases, you should not forget that SuperMemo computes
intervals with a high degree of accuracy that cannot otherwise be easily achieved
(David Mckenzie, New Zealand, Apr 8, 1998)
Question:
Is there any point in keeping collections separate?
Answer:
No. Once you master contents categories and templates, there is no point. You gain global search, global registries, global repetitions, global optimization, etc. This would
not be advisable in SuperMemo 7 as item difficulty measure (E-factor) was dependent on the
average difficulty of items in the collection. Presently, the
item difficulty measure (A-Factor, or absolute difficulty
factor) is absolute and does not depend on the context in which an item is placed. Only the length of the first interval
will significantly be affected by the average difficulty of items in the collection.
However, this shall not bear dramatically on the speed of
learning. Especially that variable forgetting index
for individual items makes it possible to set different first intervals for whole contents
categories or branches of
the knowledge tree
(Noel Clary, USA, Aug 17, 1998)
Question:
I have created my own database on plumbing and air conditioning. My forgetting index is quite high. Are there any tools in
SuperMemo which could help me remedy this situation?
Answer:
You might want to use View : Other browsers :
Leeches
and locate the elements that cause most problems in
learning. You must then go into your own mind to answer the question why these elements
are hard to recall. Usually these are too complex, too long, too boring or too similar to
other elements in the same collection. You can also send 3-4 most difficult items to us
for review to receive some suggestions. Read more: Leeches,
and 20 Rules of Formulating Knowledge
(Matt Cassidy,
New Zealand, Sep 11, 1997)
Question:
Is it possible that with forgetting index equal to 3% I get the first interval equal to 6
days?
Answer:
Yes. Especially if the material you work with is relatively easy. You should also remember
about the random dispersion of intervals. In isolated cases, dispersion might produce
intervals substantially longer (or shorter) than the optimum interval. For more read about
SuperMemo Algorithm
Question:
Tony Buzan claims that 75% of information is lost if not reviewed in 24 hours. Does it not
defeat the validity of SuperMemo in which the first interval is often longer than a week?
Answer:
No. Buzan's claim may refer to textbook knowledge or complex knowledge structures
(e.g. large mind maps). However, it does not seem accurate in reference to simple
well-structured material in the light of results obtained with SuperMemo. In SuperMemo, if
the student chooses the retention of 95%, the typical value of the first interval falls in
the range 2-5 days depending on the student and the difficulty of the learned material.
For retention 25%, the same interval might be as long as one month, though it cannot be
verified experimentally with SuperMemo which limits the range of the forgetting index from
3-20%, which implies the overall retention in the range of 89-99%. For more see: Theoretical background of SuperMemo
Question:
I used SuperMemo 2 shareware, and was accustomed to repeating forgotten items on the next
day. It is very irritating that in new SuperMemo, I do not have this possibility
Answer:
SuperMemo will schedule forgotten items in intervals that are determined by the forgetting index. The greatest increase in the speed of
learning in newer versions of SuperMemo as compared with SuperMemo 2 resulted from
substantially increasing the length of the first interval. The student may be left with
the feeling that he is likely to forget the item again if it is not repeated on the next
day. Statistically, however, he will forget no more than the proportion defined by the
forgetting index. By reducing the forgetting index to less than 5%, the length of the
first interval is likely to drop to 1-2 days in most cases. Moreover, if you are
particular about repeating a given item on the next day, you can choose Ctrl+M to memorize or rememorize an item with a selected
first interval
Question:
I have an exam for a driver's license in 2 weeks. How can I best memorize the Traffic
Regulations collection for SuperMemo? How can I increase the frequency of repetitions?
Answer:
Although SuperMemo is not a cramming tool, and it would be much safer to start 2-3
months before the exam, the following shall work pretty well: (1) Set Tools : Options : Learning
: Forgetting index at 3%. (2) When memorizing
difficult items, choose Ctrl+M and provide the first interval value equal to one
day. (3) Memorize the collection in equal portions in the period spanning from today to
2-4 days before the exam. Use Tools : Random review intensely
over the last 2-4 days
You can easily change the forgetting index from the keyboard (#5737)
(Jiri Pik, Czech Republic, Sat, Jun 16, 2001 16:59)
Question:
I find that changing the forgetting index of an element is pretty time-consuming without any keyboard shortcut
Answer:
You can use
Ctrl+Shift+P to open Element Parameters dialog box and
Alt+F to get to the forgetting index field
Retention statistic assumes regular repetitions and well-structured learning material (#6918)
(dansujp, Sun, Sep 16, 2001 3:07 PM)
Question:
When
I returned from vacation, I expected the retention to be something like 80% because I have not done any repetitions for two weeks.
But it was exactly the same as before I left
Answer:
The Retention statistic is derived directly from the measured forgetting index on the assumption of a negatively exponential forgetting curve. This curve is only representative of well-structured learning material. In addition, the forgetting index measurements are averaged over all recorded cases. A break in repetitions will invalidate the statistic. Resuming repetitions is not a guarantee of accuracy as the large number of earlier repetitions will result in overestimating the retention on a small-sample measurement. The only valid estimation of retention after a break in learning is the one that follows resetting the past forgetting index record
(File : Tools : Reset parameters : Forgetting index
record). This will result in gathering new data that will approach true retention for the sample tested with accuracy proportional to the number of repetitions done
Wrong recall may indicate memory interference (#6986)
(Mike Condron, Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:39 AM)
Question:
Why no recall is scored less than a wrong recall? Suppose I'm trying to remember
"What's the capital of Canada?" and I answer "Warsaw." This seemed to me to be a much worse state of affairs than
"I don't know"
Answer:
Wrong answer may put you in more trouble or shame in life, but we are interested in the state of memory here. Wrong recall is usually caused by interference from other memories and is less indicative of lost memory traces. Zero recall, on the other hand, is a clear indication of lost or severely
disrupted memories. Your grades should penalize you solely for poor memory
performance. However, you can use the forgetting index, Reschedule (Ctrl+J
or the element menu) or other tools to ensure
that mission-critical pieces of knowledge stay permanently etched in your
memory. In other words, you should never grade yourself more harshly on
important material as this will fool SuperMemo as to your performance
Use the default forgetting index to globally change the forgetting rate (#6321)
(Jiri Pik, Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:28 PM)
Question:
What is the purpose of the
default forgetting index available in Options? As far as I know, all newly created elements have the
forgetting index set according to their categories and there I cannot choose the default
forgetting index
Answer:
Options : Learning : Forgetting Index
(default forgetting index) will be used in items that have their requested forgetting index set to
Default (internally represented as zero). All items with the default setting will use the
default forgetting index currently selected in Options. You can set the default forgetting index with contents and browser operations
(Forgetting index : Default forgetting index)