| Tools : Plan |
If you think "I wish there were 20 of me" or "There aren't enough hours in the day", SuperMemo can help you with Tools : Plan.
Tools : Plan can help you do two things: first (1) say what you would like to do, and then (2) compute what can realistically be done within a day. When using the Plan you produce a list of activities and the desired time allocations for these activities. SuperMemo then checks the available time, and shortens all activities in proportion. If your days are repetitive, you can fine-tune your schedule to the last minute. If they are not, you can still benefit by planning in advance and tracking your progress as you go.
Plan can be used to plan your entire day, or it can be used to plan shorter slots, e.g. your daily learning slot. For example, your 2 hours learning time in the evening could look like this:
Using Plan to plan the entire day works best for people who are not limited by meetings, deadlines, and can freely schedule activities throughout the day. But it can also be used by people whose days change at a minute's notice or days that are not composed of regularly repeating activities.
Future society will strongly drift towards deadline-free, creative work that will excellently fit dynamic scheduling offered by Plan.
The main purpose of Plan is to keep optimum proportions of time devoted to particular activities in your schedule (e.g. 35 minutes for e-mail, 25 minutes for web surfing, 95 minutes for learning, 40 minutes for sports, 2.3 hours for the kids, etc.).
An optimally adjusted schedule is a powerful tool that can help you understand nuances of time-management. You can make one-minute daily adjustments to the schedule in order to maximize the effectiveness of your work, your health, your family life, and minimize stress and chaos introduced by poor planning. It will give you a quality insight into your own life. It will help you see the connection between your activities and their results. Plan is highly recommended for people with low-stress tolerance and perpetual problem with organizing their day.
With Tools : Plan you first create a schedule and then execute it.

Your schedule template defines your optimum at which you should strive. However, in real life you will never reach this optimum. This is why you will always need to start a day with your schedule template and modify the schedule in real-time as you go. The process of executing the schedule may also use the sound alarm that will help you terminate activities when their time is up.
This is how the schedule could have looked after having been executed (as exported with Export on the toolbar):
Oct 09, 2000, Mon (16.5 h)
The above file is directly importable to your diary providing a daily record of your performance. Note than none of the activities lasted as long as planned (100%). The figures in the parentheses indicate the actual length (ActLen field) and the percentage of time devoted to the activity as compared with the optimum. Note also that the total time was increased to 16.5 hours on this particular day due to going to sleep 30 minutes later than planned (22:30 instead of 22:00).
If you keep overrunning your allocated time slots, the remaining activities of the day will progressively gets squeezed. This is the main problem with using Plan. The problem, naturally, does not come from the system of optimizing your day with Plan. The problem comes from our natural tendency to add time to enjoyable slots, from being late, as well as from being interrupted by unexpected events (e.g. phone calls). If you do not religiously stick to the schedule, schedule optimization will not work! A vast majority of users of Plan report doing well only in the first half of the day, while activities scheduled for the evening usually get squeezed beyond usability. This is where schedule analysis with Delays comes handy. It helps you better understand your weaknesses, as well as weak spots in the schedule (i.e. activities for which you allocate too little time, activities which you tend to overrun, etc.).
Not only at the beginning, your schedule will require fine-tuning (i.e. adding a few minutes here, taking away a few minutes there, etc.). You may always want to reduce the time for breakfast and increase the time for sports or education; however, your plans may be unrealistic. In the exemplary schedule above, you may find yourself spending an average of 48 minutes for washing and breakfast as opposed to the planned 40 minutes. To prevent this from happening, you should use the button Delays to honestly analyze your schedule and realistically adjust the length of activities that you never manage to complete in time or which never get enough time as compared with the plan. The delay analysis of the schedule presented in the previous paragraph would produce the following outcome:
Delays: Oct 09, 2000, Mon (16.5 h)
(exported: Monday, October 09, 2000, 10:31:46 PM)
It is easy to notice that Rest and newspapers
was the greatest schedule offender. You have devoted 109 minutes instead of the
optimum 30 minutes, which stands for the 363% overshot. Your
lunch also lasted 71 minutes instead of just 30. In conclusion you may decide to
either improve your discipline or increase the desired length of time devoted to
lunch and the postprandial rest.
On the other end of the spectrum is your e-mail slot which was cut from 30
minutes to just 9 minutes (e.g. as a result of being late and tired). In other words,
you devoted only 30% of the planned time to e-mail. If e-mail is important, you
might increase the length of the e-mail slot, which would make it less
vulnerable to delay. Move the e-mail slot to an earlier hour (e.g. before
surfing the net) or reduce the length of activities preceding the e-mail slot.
Best of all, you should by all means avoid delays which call the whole idea of
schedule optimization in question. You have to realistically adjust the lengths of
activities and strive and completing individual slots ahead of time. This will
prevent end-of-schedule activities from being a constant casualty of delays.
Once your schedule stabilizes and you can efficiently stick to its timing, you can use the button Adjust on the toolbar that will copy OptLen fields to Length fields. This will help you adjust realistic length figures upon schedule analysis (usually, your first plans will by far exceed your abilities; hence the importance of the Adjust option).
Schedule exceptions and emergencies
The following circumstances may call for special action in the schedule manager:
Activity statistics
If you would like to keep statistics of individual activities, group activities by starting their name with the same keyword. For example, name your SuperMemo repetition slots as Reps A, Reps B and Reps C. If you select Totals on the toolbar, SuperMemo will add up the time used for repetitions by adding the length of the three slots starting with the keyword Reps. If you want to modify the length of the activity in the statistics, e.g. due to a short break, list the corrected length immediately after the keyword. For example, if Reps B lasted 23 minutes, but you had to leave for the toilet, you could correct it to read as Reps 18 B. SuperMemo will then add 18 minutes of Reps to statistics instead of 23 minutes.
Activity parameters
If your schedule is overcrowded with multiple slots, you can group some of
them together, and make SuperMemo randomly choose one on a given day, another on
another day, etc. For that purpose choose Menu : Edit or press Shift+Ctrl+P.
List the activities in individual rows of the Activity parameters dialog
box. Specify the length of individual activities and the maximum length of the
slot in Length (min). On saving the new schedule with Save as,
SuperMemo will randomly select one of the listed activities and choose its
proposed length in schedule optimization (on condition the length is not longer
than the maximum length allowed for that slot). For example, if you would like
to alternatively browse New Scientist, cnn.com and Scientific American websites,
and your time is too short to go to all these places in your reading slot, you
can ask SuperMemo to randomly assign a single site on a given day, so that you
could explore them individually. SuperMemo may then list the following entry in
the schedule:
{#R: 16 Read NS | 10 Read cnn.com | 13 Read SciAm}
This indicates that Plan will try to allocate randomly 16 minutes for
NS, 10 min. for cnn.com or 13 min. for SciAm. Naturally, as always, the actual
length of these activities will depend on the allocation of time for other
things on this particular day.
Other options : Toolbar
Other options : Menu
FAQ
Use incremental reading instead of Plan to optimize time
allocations to different subjects
Tasklist vs. Plan
SuperMemo Plan is not of much use beyond SuperMemo
Gray fields cannot be edited
SuperMemo Plan is not of much use beyond SuperMemo
(zm, Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:14 PM)
Question:
I would like to see better integration of
Tools : Plan with MS Outlook. For example, export plan and import it in MS Outlook
Answer:
The main idea behind
Tools : Plan is to perfectly adjust proportions of time allocated to
individual activities during a day or during a learning time block. Those proportions are continually adjusted
as you proceed with the execution, and such a plan is of little use beyond SuperMemo. If you only need a record of your daily activity, you can use the
Export option among plan manager buttons
Gray fields cannot be edited
Question:
Why can I not edit the Delay field?
Answer:
Delay is computed automatically by SuperMemo
and depends on the start time of a given activity as compared with the optimum
time. Once you set the start time of an activity, it's delay (in minutes) is
fixed and cannot be changed. Only Start, Activity and Length columns
are editable. The remaining columns are determined by SuperMemo
Use incremental reading instead of Plan to optimize time
allocations to different subjects
(Luis Neves, Brazil, Dec 4, 2000)
Question:
I would like to spend five hours on effective reading and learning starting
at 6 pm. However, my interests are wide. Here are some things I would like to
read: 3 daily newspapers, 1 daily Dilbert comic strip, 1 daily Linux news
journal, 1 daily Internet news journal, 2 weekly magazines, 2 monthly science
magazines, 1 on-line book of C language, 1 on-line book of TCL/TK language, 1
site for Kylix and Delphi, 1 neuroscience site and more. What would be my
optimum strategy assuming I want to use SuperMemo and incremental reading?
Answer:
You could could best prioritize your learning with incremental
reading. This would help you optimally adjust reading proportion. However, Tools
: Plan can also be used for that purpose. You should start with
preparing a good daily plan of action. This could be your exemplary schedule:
Reading&Learning (5 h)
18:00 - SuperMemo - reading, review (81 min, 100%)
19:21 . SuperMemo - repetitions (40 min, 100%)
20:01 . SuperMemo - core (40 min, 100%)
20:41 . Linux, C, TCL/TK - 2 articles (17 min, 100%)
20:59 . Internet - 1 article (13 min, 100%)
21:12 . Kylix/Delphi - 2 articles (20 min, 100%)
21:33 . Neuroscience - 1 article (20 min, 100%)
21:53 . reading on paper (weekly, science) (61 min, 100%)
22:53 . other (Dilbert) (7 min, 100%)
The plan above was built using the following assumptions:
due to possible delays, you should put strategic slots first. If SuperMemo eats up too much time, you will just reduce the rate of importing new articles
you would import only 1-2 articles per slot (as specified in the plan). These articles would immediately be introduced into the process of incremental reading with Remember. If your article import slots (e.g. Neuroscience, Linux, etc.) produce more articles than you are able to read, use reading lists (you can also keep URLs on reading lists if you do not want your collection to swell in size too quickly)
Linux, Internet, Kylix and Neuroscience slots are supposed to be spent only on locating articles and importing them to SuperMemo. The actual reading will take place in the first slot of the day
all reading on paper was put into a single late slot. As reading on paper is by far less efficient, you will then give it lower priority and you will have to retype important notes to SuperMemo if you want to ensure long-term retention
SuperMemo reading and learning will be used for reading articles, extracting their portions, reviewing extracts, creating cloze deletions, standard repetitions, etc. Once this slot's time is over you will execute Postpone on all topics (assuming you cannot keep on reading articles without jeopardizing retention in the already mastered material)
SuperMemo repetitions will include repetitions of all clozes and items in the learning process. Once this slot's time is over, you will execute Postpone on all items in your To Do branch (assuming this is knowledge that has not yet been well-formulated and prioritized)
SuperMemo core will include only repetitions in your top-priority categories/branches. The assumption is that those categories/branches cannot be compromised for their retention and you cannot use Postpone in this slot. If you run out of time on this slot, do any or all of the following: (1) increase the time allocated in the plan, (2) reduce the inflow of new top-priority material, or (3) downgrade the priority of some branches (e.g. by allowing Postpone on those branches)
Tasklist vs. Plan
(Dobrowolski, Jarek, Poland, Fri, Aug 25, 2000 16:43)
Question:
Tasklists are an interesting concept but they are too trivial a model of reality to be universal. For example, how can I best split 9 hours into the optimum amount for sleep and jogging? Should it be 8+1 or 8.5+0.5? Tasklists do not help!
Answer:
Tasklists work well for a subset of optimization problems you will meet in your daily schedule. Your example is indeed entirely unsuitable to be handled with tasklists. Tasklists demand tasks to be well-defined, uniform and with good estimates on value and time. For example, they work great for prioritizing investments. SuperMemo has always been developed with the use of tasklists. However, you cannot prioritize your house chores and your shopping list using the same tasklist. This fails the uniformity criterion.
You need two tasklists for that. Tasklist do not work well with deadlines (even if deadlines are included in the
concept). Tasklist are not good at reflecting dependencies between the tasks. In other words they are far from universal.
For the problem of optimizing your day, you should rather use Tools : Plan. There you could include 30 minutes of jogging, 8 hours of sleep, 2 hours of incremental reading and 30 minutes of repetitions. Using delay analysis, you can easily make minor adjustments to your schedule on the daily basis. If jogging made you too tired, you could have shorten the distance and the time slot. If you did not get sweaty enough, you could add 3-5 minutes and see the results on the following day. You could add some sleep time if you do not wake up within the slot. You could also add some time for repetitions if your
incremental reading floods the learning process with topics and results in low retention. Tasklist fit well with the
Plan
within a single uniform time slot. In that slot, you can prioritize your reading, writing, making orders in your house, etc.
To sum it up: the model proposed by SuperMemo will regulate the length of the time slot with
the Plan. Within your uniform time slot you can use tasklists to prioritize individual
activities